Cymraeg | Access Keys | Site Map | Feedback
Information About...
 
Advanced search

Further Information

Daily Lists Transcripts Test cases

Case summaries

2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
Practice Directions Guidance

Further Resources

Schedule of Costs Precedents Costs Practitioners Group

The Supreme Court Costs Office

No.16 of 2001

South Coast Shipping Company Ltd v Havant Borough Council
21 December 2001
Mr Justice Pumfrey sitting with Assessors

In this case the Judge considered in detail the impact on detailed assessment proceedings of the European Convention on Human Rights, with particular relevance to the disclosure to the paying party of sensitive material relating to their bill of costs to which privilege attached. The Judge held that on a careful review of the authorities the European cases did not override the longstanding principle of privilege in English law, but he was concerned that the principle that a court should not decide issues after hearing and seeing only one side of the argument was a very powerful one. He indicated that much greater use should be made of Costs Judges and District Judges of paragraph 40.14 of the Costs Practice Direction in relation to the putting of receiving parties to their election as to how they proved particular issues of this nature.

However, on the facts, and because the Costs Judge from whom the appeal was brought had clearly considered all the relevant factors in coming to his decision that there had been no breach of the indemnity principle on the evidence available to him, the Judge dismissed the appeal, saying that to do otherwise would be to generate unfortunate and unnecessary satellite litigation.

^ Top
This page was last updated on 18 February, 2005 . Web team.
Contact us. Terms and conditions .