Cymraeg | Access Keys | Site Map | Feedback
 
Advanced search

Welsh

Welsh version of this page

Further information

History and Development of the Welsh Language in the Courts Lord Chancellor's Standing Committee for the Welsh Language Practice Directions relating to HMCS Wales Related Links Solicitors Charging Rates in Civil Assessments in Wales Welsh Language Scheme

Solicitors Charging Rates in Civil Assessments in Wales


 

 Grade 1 or A
£/hour

 Grade 2 or B
£/hour

 Grade 3 or C
£/hour

 Grade 4 or D
£/hour

From 1 January 2005        
Cardiff inner

 184

163 

137 

100 

Outer Cardiff, Swansea & Newport

 173

152 

126 

95 

All other parts of South & West Wales

 158

142 

121 

90 

From 1 November 2004  
Chester & North Wales

 165-175

145-155 

125-130 

90-100 

From 6 April 2003        
Chester & North Wales

 150-165

135-145 

115-120 

85-90 

From 1 January 2003        
Cardiff inner

 175

155 

130 

95 

Outer Cardiff, Swansea & Newport

 165

145

 120

90 

South Wales

 150

135 

115 

85 

From 11 May 2001        
Cardiff inner

 155

145 

120 

85 

Outer Cardiff & South Wales

 135

125 

115 

80 

Chester & North Wales

 110-140

86-108 

55-97.5 

N/A

From 1 January 2001        
Cardiff inner

 145

145 

120 

85 

Outer Cardiff & South Wales

 125

125 

115 

80 

From 1 January 2000        
Swansea

 125

115 

80 

N/A 

From 26 April 1999  
Cardiff inner

 110-140

110-140

75-110 

55-75 

Swansea

 120

108 

75 

N/A

Wales & Chester Circuit except inner Cardiff & Swansea

 110-140

86-108 

55-97.5 

N/A

^Top

Breakdown of Grades/Bands

There are four grades of fee earners now shown as bands A to D which may previously have been identified as either grade or scale 1 to 4.

Breakdown from 11 May 2001

Band A Solicitors with over 8 years post-qualification experience including litigation experience.
Band B Solicitors and legal executives with over 4 years post-qualification experience including at least 4 years litigation experience.
Band C Other solicitors, legal executives and fee earners of equivalent experience.
Band D Trainee solicitors, paralegals and fee earners of equivalent experience.

Breakdown up to 11 May 2001

Band A Partners and solicitors with over 4 years post-qualification experience.
Band B Solicitors with up to 4 years post-qualification experience and senior legal executives.
Band C Legal executives and senior paralegals.
Band D Trainee solicitors and junior paralegals.

"Legal Executive" means a Fellow of the Institute of Legal Executives.  Those who are not fellows of the institute are not entitled to call themselves legal executives and in principle are therefore not entitled to the same hourly rate as a legal executive.

Unqualified clerks who are fee earners of equivalent experience may be entitled to similar rates and in this regard it should be borne in mind that fellows of the institute of legal executives generally spend two years in a solicitor's office before passing their part 1 general examinations, spend a further two years before passing their part 2 specialist examinations and then complete a further two years in practice before being able to become fellows.  Fellows have therefore acquired considerable practical and academic experience.  Clerks without the equivalent experience of legal executives will be treated as being in the bottom grade of fee earner i.e. trainee solicitors and fee earners of equivalent experience.  Whether or not a fee earner has equivalent experience is ultimately a matter for the discretion of the court.

Many High Court cases justify fee earners at a senior level.  However the same may not be true of attendance at pre-trial hearing with counsel.  The task of siting behind counsel should be delegated to a more junior fee earner in all but the most important pre-trial hearings.  As with hourly rates the costs estimate supplied by the paying party may be of assistance.  What grade of fee earner did they use.

In some proceedings solicitors appear as advocates more frequently than they used to.  It must be borne in mind that, especially in substantial hearings, it may be more economical if the advocacy is conducted by counsel rather than a solicitor.  In all cases the court should consider whether the decision whether or not to instruct counsel has led to an increase in costs and whether that increase is justifiable.


^ Top
This page was last updated on 02 April 2007 08:38. Chris Hinds.
Contact us Terms and conditions .