Cymraeg | Access Keys | Site Map | Feedback
Legal / Professional
 
Advanced search

Practice Directions by Court

Consolidated Criminal Practice Directions Administrative Court Admiralty Court Chancery Division Commercial Court Companies Court County Courts Court of Appeal - Civil Division Court of Appeal - Criminal Division Court of Protection Crown Court Family Division Magistrates' Courts National Taxing Team. Patents Court Queen's Bench Division Senior Court Costs Office Technology and Construction Court HMCS Wales

Practice Directions

Society of Lloyd's v Sir William Jaffray & Others


The management of the Lloyd's litigation has been the responsibility of the Commercial Court. Prior to the market settlement in 1996, the Commercial Court identified and decided a number of preliminary issues which (subject to appeals) assisted in resolving certain common issues of principle. In addition, the court selected and decided a number of lead or pilot cases for trial as to liability and general principles relating to quantum.

In September 1996 a market settlement was arrived at. About 95 per cent of Names accepted the market settlement. 1,752 Names did not accept. About 180 Names have since reached individual settlements with The Society of Lloyd's ("Lloyd's"). Of the remaining Names, about 148 are Claimants in the Jaffray action referred to below and about 1,420 are not.

In High Court proceedings commenced by Sir William Jaffray and others ("the claimants") against Lloyd's, the claimants have alleged that they were fraudulently induced to become or remain underwriting members of the Lloyd's market by reason of Lloyd's failure to disclose the nature and extent of the market's liability for asbestos-related claims.

The Commercial Court has ordered that the trial of this issue ("the Threshold Fraud Issue") in relation to three sample Names will take place in the High Court in London starting in January 2000. It is important that all Names who have not entered into settlement agreements with Lloyd's, either as a result of the Reconstruction and Renewal Initiative or otherwise, appreciate that so far as the High Court of Justice of England and Wales is concerned, this trial is intended finally to resolve allegations of fraud in respect of the treatment of asbestos-related losses at Lloyd's between 1978 and 1988.

^ Top

Accordingly, any individuals who wish to reserve the right to advance such allegations against Lloyd's before the High Court of Justice of England and Wales must provide written notice to Lloyd's solicitors, Freshfields, at 65 Fleet Street, London (reference: RDP/GN, fax number 0171 832 7001) by no later than:

(1) 3 December 1999 in the case of an individual ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom and Europe;

(2) 10 December 1999 in the case of other individuals, confirming that they wish to become parties to the litigation. Failing timely service of such a notice, these individuals will thereafter be precluded from advancing such allegations without permission of this court. An individual who provides written notice by the specified date will be entitled to become a party to the proceedings on date of receipt of such notice and will be bound by the High Court's determination of the Threshold Fraud Issue. In the event that the action is unsuccessful, a party serving such a notice may be liable for a proportionate share of Lloyd's costs.

Individuals who wish to obtain further information on the Threshold Fraud Issue or as to the method of becoming a party to the action may contact the claimants' solicitors, More Fisher Brown of 1 Norton Folgate, London, E1 6DA, telephone 0171 247 0438, Fax 0171 422 0760, reference: Jim Edwards, Alison McNair.

In order to become a party to the action, it will be necessary for each individual who gives notice to Freshfields as above either (a) to give instructions for that purpose to the United Names Organisation, 224-225 Temple Chambers, London, EC4Y 0PH, phone number 0171 353 2900, or More Fisher Brown, as above, on or before 10 December 1999; or (b) to make application to the court for directions on or before 10 December 1999.

(End of statement)



^ Top
This page was last updated on 23 February 2005 12:34. Web Team.
Contact us . Terms and conditions .